When Growth Outpaces the State: Fiscal Capacity Constraints in a Resource-Based Industrial Growth Pole, Evidence from Morowali, Indonesia

Authors

  • Muhyiddin Muhyiddin Ministry of National Development Planning/Bappenas
  • Muhammad Dio Rhiza Amrizal The Indonesia Think Tank and Policy Lab
  • Nugroho Habibi The Indonesia Think Tank and Policy Lab
  • Achmanto Mendatu The Indonesia Think Tank and Policy Lab

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36574/jpp.v10i1.840

Keywords:

industrialization, jobless growth, employment elasticity, labor market transformation, resource-based industrialization, global value chains, labor formalization, skill upgrading, wage dynamics, Indonesia, Morowali, nickel industry

Abstract

Rapid industrialization is widely expected to strengthen fiscal capacity by expanding the economic base and increasing public revenues. However, this assumption remains underexplored at the subnational level, particularly in the context of resource-based industrialization. This paper examines the relationship between industrialization and fiscal transformation using the case of Morowali Regency, Indonesia—one of the fastest-growing industrial regions in the Global South driven by nickel downstreaming.

Using subnational data for the period 2011–2025, the study combines longitudinal analysis, fiscal ratio evaluation, and a Difference-in-Differences approach with Central Sulawesi Province as a benchmark. The results reveal a striking divergence: while gross regional domestic product (GRDP) increased more than fortyfold, local government revenue grew only fourfold. Consequently, the revenue-to-GRDP ratio declined sharply from 14.93 percent to 1.35 percent, with similar patterns observed in expenditure ratios. Econometric estimates confirm a statistically significant decline in fiscal capacity relative to the regional benchmark following the onset of industrialization.

To explain this pattern, the paper introduces the concept of fiscal effort collapse, defined as a sustained decline in the relative fiscal capacity of the state in the context of rapid economic growth. The findings challenge the conventional view that industrialization inherently strengthens state capacity, and instead suggest that, under certain institutional and structural conditions, growth can outpace the fiscal system’s ability to capture and redistribute economic value.

The paper contributes to the literature by extending growth pole theory to include fiscal dynamics, highlighting limitations in fiscal federalism, and reframing state capacity as a relative concept. The findings have important policy implications for countries pursuing resource-based industrialization, emphasizing the need to align fiscal systems with the scale and structure of economic transformation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson, J. A. (2016). Institutions as a fundamental cause of long-run growth. In P. Aghion & S. N. Durlauf (Eds.), Handbook of economic growth (Vol. 2, pp. 385–472). Elsevier.

Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2019). The narrow corridor: States, societies, and the fate of liberty. Penguin Press.

Aghion, P., Antonin, C., & Bunel, S. (2021). The power of creative destruction: Economic upheaval and the wealth of nations. Harvard University Press.

Altenburg, T., & Assmann, C. (2017). Green industrial policy: Concept, policies, country experiences. UN Environment.

Bahl, R., & Bird, R. M. (2018). Fiscal decentralization and local finance in developing countries: Development from below? Public Finance Review, 46(2), 261–295. https://doi.org/10.1177/1091142115615983

Besley, T., & Persson, T. (2017). The dynamics of state capacity. American Economic Review, 100(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.100.1.1

Boadway, R., & Shah, A. (2009). Fiscal federalism: Principles and practice of multiorder governance. Cambridge University Press.

Fujita, M., Krugman, P., & Venables, A. J. (1999). The spatial economy: Cities, regions, and international trade. MIT Press.

International Monetary Fund (IMF). (2022). Public investment management assessment (PIMA). IMF.

Krugman, P. (1991). Increasing returns and economic geography. Journal of Political Economy, 99(3), 483–499. https://doi.org/10.1086/261763

Martinez-Vazquez, J., Lago-Peñas, S., & Sacchi, A. (2017). The impact of fiscal decentralization: A survey. Journal of Economic Surveys, 31(4), 1095–1129. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12182

Mehlum, H., Moene, K., & Torvik, R. (2016). Institutions and the resource curse. Economic Journal, 116(508), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2006.01045.x

Morris, M., Kaplinsky, R., & Kaplan, D. (2019). One thing leads to another: Commodities, linkages and industrial development. Resources Policy, 61, 329–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2018.09.008.

Muhyiddin, M. (2026). Tahun 2026 dan Transisi Indonesia Menuju Negara Berpendapatan Tinggi. Bappenas Working Papers, 9(1), 4 - 15. https://doi.org/10.47266/bwp.v9i1.534.

Muhyiddin, M., Mendatu, A., Amrizal, M. D. R., & Wahyuningrat, J. (2026a). Dapatkah Hilirisasi Mineral Mendorong Transformasi Ekonomi Daerah? Bukti dari Indonesia Morowali Industrial Park. Bappenas Working Papers, 9(2), 256-273. https://doi.org/10.47266/bwp.v9i2.559.

Muhyiddin, M., Mendatu, A., & Amrizal, M. D. R. (2026b). Ekonomi Politik Hilirisasi Nikel dan Transformasi Morowali sebagai Episentrum Industrialisasi Baru Indonesia. Bappenas Working Papers, 9(2), 274-302. https://doi.org/10.47266/bwp.v9i2.567.

Oates, W. E. (1999). An essay on fiscal federalism. Journal of Economic Literature, 37(3), 1120–1149. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.37.3.1120.

Pritchett, L. (2019). State capability: The basics. Oxford University Press.

Rodrik, D. (2021). Industrial policy for the twenty-first century. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 35(3), 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.35.3.3

Sachs, J. D., & Warner, A. M. (2001). The curse of natural resources. European Economic Review, 45(4–6), 827–838. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2921(01)00125-8

Stiglitz, J. E. (2016). The state, the market, and development. W. W. Norton & Company.

United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO). (2022). Industrial development report 2022: The future of industrialization in a post-pandemic world. UNIDO.

Venables, A. J. (2016). Using natural resources for development: Why has it proven so difficult? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 30(1), 161–184. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.30.1.161

World Bank. (2009). World Development Report 2009: Reshaping Economic Geography. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-7607-2.

World Bank. (2024). World development report 2024: The middle-income trap. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-2078-6.

World Bank. (2023). East Asia and Pacific economic update. October 2023: Services for Development. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-2028-1.

Downloads

Published

30-04-2026 — Updated on 03-05-2026

Issue

Section

Indonesia's New Growth Center: The IMIP Model

How to Cite

When Growth Outpaces the State: Fiscal Capacity Constraints in a Resource-Based Industrial Growth Pole, Evidence from Morowali, Indonesia. (2026). Jurnal Perencanaan Pembangunan: The Indonesian Journal of Development Planning, 10(1), 92-114. https://doi.org/10.36574/jpp.v10i1.840

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2 3 > >>