Polycentric Collaborative Governance and Circular Economy in Urban Waste Systems: Public Value Co-Creation Through CSR–Community Partnerships in Surabaya, Indonesia

Authors

  • Muhammad Farid Ma'ruf Universitas Negeri Surabaya
  • Ajie Hanif Muzaqi State Administrative Science Study Program, State University of Surabaya
  • Gatra Taurista Ramadhani State Administrative Science Study Program, State University of Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36574/jpp.v9i3.781

Keywords:

Polycentric Governance, Collaborative Governance, Circular Economy, CSR Partnerships, Urban Waste Management

Abstract

This study examines how polycentric collaborative governance enables the implementation of circular economy principles in urban waste management through a case analysis of the Bintang Mangrove Waste Bank (BSBM) in Surabaya, Indonesia. Using a qualitative design involving in-depth interviews, field observations, and document analysis, the research explores how government agencies, corporate social responsibility (CSR) actors, and community organizations coordinate within a multi-level governance system. The findings reveal that Surabaya’s waste management system operates through interconnected decision centers that combine regulatory facilitation by the Environmental Agency (DLH), resource and capacity support from PT PLN’s CSR initiatives, and community-led recycling practices. These interactions generate an adaptive governance network characterized by trust, shared learning, and reciprocal resource flows. The collaboration evolves through three phases—initiation, consolidation, and institutionalization—demonstrating increasing coordination, strengthened incentives, and deeper community ownership. The study also shows that CSR-backed waste banks expand circular economy outcomes by diverting waste from landfills, creating household economic value, and fostering behavioral change. Overall, the research provides empirical evidence that integrating polycentric and collaborative governance with circular economy frameworks creates a robust platform for public value co-creation and strengthens the sustainability of urban environmental management in emerging cities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Albareda, L., Lozano, J. M., Tencati, A., Midttun, A., & Perrini, F. (2008). The changing role of governments in corporate social responsibility: drivers and responses. Business Ethics: A European Review, 17(4), 347–363.

Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571.

Bryson, J., Sancino, A., Benington, J., & Sørensen, E. (2017). Towards a multi-actor theory of public value co-creation. Public Management Review, 19(5), 640–654.

Carlisle, K., & Gruby, R. L. (2019). Polycentric systems of governance: A theoretical model for the commons. Policy Studies Journal, 47(4), 927–952.

Dinas Lingkungan Hidup Kota Surabaya. (2025). Laporan Kinerja Pengelolaan Sampah 2024. Pemerintah Kota Surabaya .

Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2012). An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(1), 1–29.

Eprilianto, D. E., Ma’ruf, M. F., Pradana, G. W., Hilmi, A. N., & Habibah, U. N. (2022). Analysis of Students’ Participation in Practicing the Concept of Green Campus. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1111(1), 012072.

Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N. M. P., & Hultink, E. J. (2017). The Circular Economy–A new sustainability paradigm? Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, 757–768.

Huxham, C., & Vangen, S. (2013). Managing to collaborate: The theory and practice of collaborative advantage. Routledge.

Jessop, B. (2003). Governance and metagovernance: On reflexivity, requisite variety, and requisite irony. Governance as Social and Political Communication, 101.

Kirchherr, J., Reike, D., & Hekkert, M. (2017). Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 127, 221–232.

McGinnis, M. D. (2011). An introduction to IAD and the language of the Ostrom workshop: a simple guide to a complex framework. Policy Studies Journal, 39(1), 169–183.

Ostrom, E. (2017). Polycentric systems for coping with collective action and global environmental change. In Global justice (pp. 423–430). Routledge.

Pemerintah Kota Surabaya. (2024). BSIS Target Penjualan Sampah Kering 150 Ton per Bulan. Portal Resmi Pemkot Surabaya.

Sakti, Y. K., & Andi, D. (2024). Pemodelan Sistem Dinamis Analisis Ketercapaian Reduksi Sampah Plastik Pada TPA Kota Surabaya. Jurnal Teknik Industri Terintegrasi, 7(3), 1874–1881.

SIPSN KLHK. (2024). Capaian Kinerja Pengelolaan Sampah Kota Surabaya 2023. Https://Sipsn.Kemenlh.Go.Id.

Skene, K., & Oarga-Mulec, A. (2024). The circular economy: The butterfly diagram, systems theory and the economic pluriverse. Journal of Circular Economy, 2(3).

Voorberg, W. H., Bekkers, V. J. J. M., & Tummers, L. G. (2015). A systematic review of co-creation and co-production: Embarking on the social innovation journey. Public Management Review, 17(9), 1333–1357.

Wang, S. (2014). Research on the collaborative governance model in the charity organization under polycentric perspective. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 2(9), 263–269.

Downloads

Published

30-12-2025

How to Cite

Polycentric Collaborative Governance and Circular Economy in Urban Waste Systems: Public Value Co-Creation Through CSR–Community Partnerships in Surabaya, Indonesia. (2025). Jurnal Perencanaan Pembangunan: The Indonesian Journal of Development Planning, 9(3), 408-421. https://doi.org/10.36574/jpp.v9i3.781